Are you the victim of FUD?
If you read newspapers, watch television, visit websites or listen to the radio, there’s a chance you’ve been a frequent FUD victim. Not only are you a victim, but you probably don’t even know you’re being victimized. Here are some examples:
- You’re informed that if you use a competing brand of whitening toothpaste, your teeth will look yellow.
- You’re told that if you wash your hair with a competing dandruff shampoo, ugly flakes will remain.
- You’re notified that if you use a competing tax service, you might pay unwarranted taxes.
- You’re told that by supporting the other candidate or political party, everything you hold dear might be destroyed.
These are just a few examples of the marketing concept called FUD – fear, uncertainty and doubt.
Rather than telling consumers or voters about the benefits of their product, service or position, the marketing campaign is based on fear, uncertainty and doubt. Armageddon could happen to you personally or professionally if you go with the competing brand or politician.
In politics, FUD is referred to as negative marketing or mudslinging. The candidate doesn’t focus on what he/she would do if elected, but why their opponent would be a terrible choice. Although voters consistently tell pollsters they hate negative ads, those same voters remember them and vote accordingly.
Digital FUD campaigns
FUD is most successful on the internet because it only takes seconds to transfer information to the entire world.
Art Coviello, executive vice president of EMC Corporation and executive chairman of RSA, was the keynote speaker at a recent RSA conference. EMC is an international provider of IT storage hardware solutions to promote data backup and recovery. According to reporter Lain Thomson:
If it’s on the Net it’s the truth – maybe
Many people are skeptical about what they read in newspapers, but less so when it comes to the Internet. By the time a story or ad is revealed as misleading or false, it could have been read by millions of people.
Think about recent research you’ve performed on the Internet. For instance, have you sought out an answer to a health issue? Claudia Pitts, Ph.D. writes in a column, “Playing Doctor: Women, Cancer, Marketing and the Internet,” most of us aren’t verifying online information:
Marketing concern or fear
There’s a fine line between the marketing of concern and the marketing of fear.
Let’s assume Brand “A” is a healthy and nutritious food. Here are the two ways the product could be marketed:
- Marketing of Concern: Brand “A” is a healthier food as it’s made with nutritious ingredients, while brand “B” is high in sugar.
- Marketing of Fear: If you eat brand “B” instead of Brand “A,” you won’t get proper nutrients, which could lead to serious health issues.
Businesses and politicians that market FUD should be certain they have the facts and figures on their side. Otherwise they lose credibility and look foolish.
Here are two examples:
- Microsoft vs Google: Last year, Microsoft conducted a FUD campaign against Google as they wanted people to be worried about breaches in personal security, a timely topic as everyone wants to maintain control over their personal information. Microsoft’s ads, which used Google’s name, effectively created fear, uncertainty and doubt about trusting Google.Although Google recently settled a privacy case brought by 38 states involving its Street View mapping project, some industry leaders question whether Microsoft privacy controls are superior to Google’s. It will be fascinating to see if Microsoft creates a follow-up FUD campaign against Google.
- Republicans vs Democrats: A recent political FUD example comes from President Obama and his ill-fated handling of the sequester. The sequester was the president’s idea, but his fear campaign made it seem as if life in the United States would shatter if a paltry 2.4 percent of cuts to future growth were allowed to go through. Even the liberal media denounced the president’s FUD campaign.In his column, “How Republicans Got Their Grove Back,” Conn Carroll wrote:
“As sequestration approached, Obama dispatched his Cabinet secretaries to wage a campaign of fear, designed to pressure Republicans to agree to tax hikes to end the sequester. All of these claims turned out to be completely false.”
Have confidence in your customers or voters
Don’t fall into the trap of using FUD as a marketing campaign.
Instead promote your strengths, which can indirectly highlight your competitor’s weaknesses. It could be as simple as a checklist of what someone should be looking for when it comes to making a selection.
Should your competitors or opponents use fear, uncertainty and doubt against you, have confidence that your customers or voters will see through the FUD and realize that you offer the best product, service or position in the marketplace.
In the Marketing Maven’s opinion, marketing with FUD is a dud!
Featured photo
Marketing Maven Robin Itzler wants you to avoid the fog of FUD.
More about Orange County Breeze
Did you know that we have a monthly print edition?
We do!
We also have digital version of our print edition online.
To receive a daily email summary of the news, subscribe to our free daily feed!
You can also like us on Facebook and follow us on Twitter!
Related articles
- Stop saying ‘Cyber Pearl Harbor,’ RSA boss pleads (go.theregister.com)
- How to Profit From Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt in Your Life (bigthink.com)
- Stop FUD From Paralyzing Your Marketing (marketingprofs.com)
- Fighting dirty: Microsoft’s mean ‘Scroogled’ ads are a sign of what’s to come (theverge.com)
- Why Microsoft Shouldn’t Have Bothered ‘Scroogling’ Google (readwrite.com)
- Marketing and Our Buyer’s Defense Mechanisms (customerthink.com)
- Marketing Maven: Closing the sale through email (oc-breeze.com)
- Marketing Maven: You can do it with the right marketing message! (oc-breeze.com)



























Great article! Enjoy reading your columns.
Thank you Stephanie.
Please be sure to read the many other interesting articles on the “Orange County Breeze.”
Regards,
Robin Itzler
the Marketing Maven