California Attorney General Xavier Becerra led a bipartisan coalition of 21 states in filing an amicus brief in the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals to defend the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) in Brakeen v. Zinke. ICWA is a 40-year-old federal law that furthers the best interests of Native American children and protects the sovereignty of Indian tribes by preserving children’s connections to their tribal heritage.
“ICWA has a strong track record of not only helping to ensure the continued vitality of Native American tribes, but also of benefitting children and families as well. California is home to the nation’s largest Native American population; it is only right that we lead the fight to defend successful federal laws that have meant so much to our American Indian children, families, and tribes,” said Attorney General Becerra. “ICWA has been a key factor in reforming our child welfare system to stop the erosion of Tribal sovereignty caused by decades of unnecessary removals of Native American children from their families, and the California Department of Justice is proud to lead a large and diverse group of States working to preserve it.”
First enacted in 1978, ICWA was a response to a history of culturally insensitive and ignorant removal of Indian children from their birth families. This resulted in the separation of Indian children from not only their families, but their tribes and heritage as well. ICWA’s purpose is to “protect the best interests of Indian children and promote the stability and security of Indian tribes and families by the establishment of minimum Federal standards” to be utilized in child welfare proceedings involving Native American children.
In this case, individual plaintiffs, along with the states of Texas, Louisiana, and Indiana, sued the U.S. Department of the Interior and its now-former Secretary Ryan Zinke to challenge the law. In October 2018, the district court for the Northern District of Texas agreed and struck down much of ICWA on constitutional grounds. The brief filed today by Attorney General Becerra and 21 other Attorneys General argues that ICWA is an appropriate exercise of Congress’s broad authority to legislate in the field of Indian affairs and does not violate the Tenth Amendment or equal protection principles. The brief also highlights ICWA’s important role in reducing disparities in child removal rates and improving the collaboration between states and tribes relating to their shared interest in improving the health and welfare of Native American children.
Joining Attorney General Becerra in filing the brief are the Attorneys General of Alaska, Arizona, Colorado, Idaho, Illinois, Iowa, Maine, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Mississippi, Montana, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin.
A copy of the brief can be found here.
This article was released by the California Attorney General’s Office.
How about Attorney General Becerra protecting ALL AMERICAN CHILDREN? Stop the insanity from the invasion of illegal aliens including the illegal alien criminals who injure and murder American children!
Stop the Sanctuary State & Build the Wall
Saturday, January 26, 2019
1 p.m. to 3 p.m.
Corner of Beach & Edinger
None of these 21-attorney’s general can answer this simple question…a question so simple, it is hard. “Where is the proclamation ratified by the voters of the United States to amend our United States Constitution to make the health, welfare, safety and benefits of a select group of U.S./State citizens distinguishable because of their “Indian ancestry/race?” In short, none are upholding their oath of office to support and defend our United States Constitution as none can provide the enumerated powers in our United States Constitution for the existence of U.S.C-Title 25-INDIANS. Post passage of the Indian Citizenship Act of 1924, they are U.S./State citizens with “Indian ancestry/race” entitled to no more and no less than every other U.S./State citizen! That makes the Indian Child Welfare Act a blood-quantum race-based fraud upon the United States Constitution that runs head first into the Constitution’s 14th Amendments’ equal protection provision and several other United States Constitution prohibitions on race-based statutory law absent an Amendment to do so.
Comments are closed.