Rep. Cisneros co-leads bipartisan letter urging DoD to review active duty policy on white supremacist activity

Representatives Gilbert R. Cisneros, Jr. (CA-39), Jackie Speier (CA-14), Anthony Brown (MD-04), and Veronica Escobar (TX-16) led a bipartisan letter with 36 other House Members urging Department of Defense (DoD) Secretary Mark Esper to clarify active duty personnel policy on prohibited activities surrounding extremist and white supremacist ideology and activity. The letter is in response to several recent reported incidents, including active duty Air Force Staff Sergeant Steven Carrillo killing two law enforcement officers in Northern California and publicly declaring his allegiance to the extremist Boogaloo movement by scrawling a phrase in blood on top of a stolen car. The full letter can be viewed here.
 
“We write to urge your clarification and immediate review of existing Department of Defense active duty personnel policy on prohibited activities, particularly regarding extremist and white supremacist ideology and activity. Recent events have raised concerns that existing policies are insufficient and poorly enforced, risking not only the American people, but also other U.S. servicemembers,” the Members wrote. “Such a lax, unenforced, policy towards individuals that participate in extremist and white supremacist organizations is deeply concerning.”
 
The members requested a response to the following questions:
  1. Are servicemembers prohibited from membership in an organization that espouses an ideology or doctrine covered as prohibited activities under current DoD policy (DODI 1325.06)? If not, is it the position of the Department of Defense that it is acceptable for a servicemember to be a member of an extremist or white supremacist organization?
  2. How does the Department currently track incidents of active participation (as defined in DODI 1325.06) in prohibited activities undertaken by servicemembers?
  3. How does the Department define “supremacist” and “extremist” as referenced in DODI 1325.06? Are white supremacist groups covered by such terms?
  4. What is the current policy for servicemembers who admit or are found to actively participate in extremist or white supremacist groups? Are they administratively separated? Are they subject to Non-Judicial Punishment? Is any action subject to the discretion of the commanding officer (i.e., not mandated or required)?
  5. Was the Air Force aware that Staff Sergeant Carrillo was sympathetic to or an adherent to Boogaloo ideology?
  6. What resources are devoted to addressing violations of DODI 1325.06? Are military criminal investigative organizations employed to investigate violations of this policy?
  7. How does the Department assess potential recruits for membership in or affinity for white supremacist or extremist ideology?
    1. Does Department policy allow former members of such groups, or those that have shown sympathies with supremacist or extremist ideologies, to join the Armed Forces? Are recruiters trained to recognize potential warning signs in prospective recruits?
  1. What training does the Department provide to servicemembers to increase awareness about extremist or white supremacist attempts to recruit them? Do they receive counterintelligence training regarding extremist or white supremacist organizations?
  2. Provide an update on the status on the implementation of Sec. 593 of the FY2020 NDAA on the incorporation of questions regarding extremism in surveys administered by the Department of Defense, to include which surveys were modified, the questions that were added, any preliminary data that has been collected, and how these surveys are being used to assess the prevalence of racism, anti-Semitism, Islamophobia, white supremacy and other forms of bigotry.

This article was released by the Office of Congressman Gilbert R. Cisneros Jr.